1. Please rate your organization's interest in conducting the following types of information analysis (5 = highest, 1 = lowest, N/A = not applicable): answers 1 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Competitive intelligence Competitive intelligence - 5 (High) Competitive intelligence - 4 Competitive intelligence - 3 Competitive intelligence - 2 Competitive intelligence - 1 (Low) Competitive intelligence - N/A Data analysis/data mining Data analysis/data mining - 5 (High) Data analysis/data mining - 4 Data analysis/data mining - 3 Data analysis/data mining - 2 Data analysis/data mining - 1 (Low) Data analysis/data mining - N/A Economic analysis Economic analysis - 5 (High) Economic analysis - 4 Economic analysis - 3 Economic analysis - 2 Economic analysis - 1 (Low) Economic analysis - N/A Patent analysis Patent analysis - 5 (High) Patent analysis - 4 Patent analysis - 3 Patent analysis - 2 Patent analysis - 1 (Low) Patent analysis - N/A Prospect analysis Prospect analysis - 5 (High) Prospect analysis - 4 Prospect analysis - 3 Prospect analysis - 2 Prospect analysis - 1 (Low) Prospect analysis - N/A 2. Please rate your organization's level of interest in the following areas (5=high, 1=low): answers 2 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Content management Content management - 5 (High) Content management - 4 Content management - 3 Content management - 2 Content management - 1 (Low) Content management - N/A Digitization of own materials Digitization of own materials - 5 (High) Digitization of own materials - 4 Digitization of own materials - 3 Digitization of own materials - 2 Digitization of own materials - 1 (Low) Digitization of own materials - N/A Indexing of own materials Indexing of own materials - 5 (High) Indexing of own materials - 4 Indexing of own materials - 3 Indexing of own materials - 2 Indexing of own materials - 1 (Low) Indexing of own materials - N/A Materials access/user authentication Materials access/user authentication - 5 (High) Materials access/user authentication - 4 Materials access/user authentication - 3 Materials access/user authentication - 2 Materials access/user authentication - 1 (Low) Materials access/user authentication - N/A Knowledge management Knowledge management - 5 (High) Knowledge management - 4 Knowledge management - 3 Knowledge management - 2 Knowledge management - 1 (Low) Knowledge management - N/A Benchmarking/best practices Benchmarking/best practices - 5 (High) Benchmarking/best practices - 4 Benchmarking/best practices - 3 Benchmarking/best practices - 2 Benchmarking/best practices - 1 (Low) Benchmarking/best practices - N/A 3. Please rate the quality of the PA Website at https://www.pa.utulsa.edu in the following areas: answers 3 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Appearance Appearance - 5 (High) Appearance - 4 Appearance - 3 Appearance - 2 Appearance - 1 (Low) Appearance - N/A Ease of use Ease of use - 5 (High) Ease of use - 4 Ease of use - 3 Ease of use - 2 Ease of use - 1 (Low) Ease of use - N/A Helpfulness Helpfulness - 5 (High) Helpfulness - 4 Helpfulness - 3 Helpfulness - 2 Helpfulness - 1 (Low) Helpfulness - N/A Relevance Relevance - 5 (High) Relevance - 4 Relevance - 3 Relevance - 2 Relevance - 1 (Low) Relevance - N/A Structure Structure - 5 (High) Structure - 4 Structure - 3 Structure - 2 Structure - 1 (Low) Structure - N/A comment 3 Comments: 4. Please rate the quality of Petroleum Abstracts' BRICKS Online Search Aids in the following areas: answers 4 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Appearance Appearance - 5 (High) Appearance - 4 Appearance - 3 Appearance - 2 Appearance - 1 (Low) Appearance - N/A Ease of use Ease of use - 5 (High) Ease of use - 4 Ease of use - 3 Ease of use - 2 Ease of use - 1 (Low) Ease of use - N/A Helpfulness Helpfulness - 5 (High) Helpfulness - 4 Helpfulness - 3 Helpfulness - 2 Helpfulness - 1 (Low) Helpfulness - N/A Relevance Relevance - 5 (High) Relevance - 4 Relevance - 3 Relevance - 2 Relevance - 1 (Low) Relevance - N/A Structure Structure - 5 (High) Structure - 4 Structure - 3 Structure - 2 Structure - 1 (Low) Structure - N/A comment 4 Comments: 5. Where does your library or information group report in your organization's structure: answers 5 Choose one: Information technology (IT) group Shared services/support services group Records management group Facilities group Exploration and production (E&P) group Research and development (R&D) group Other: or 6. Please rate the quality of Petroleum Abstracts' TULSA database in the following categories: answers 6 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Coverage Coverage - 5 (High) Coverage - 4 Coverage - 3 Coverage - 2 Coverage - 1 (Low) Coverage - N/A Ease of use Ease of use - 5 (High) Ease of use - 4 Ease of use - 3 Ease of use - 2 Ease of use - 1 (Low) Ease of use - N/A Indexing Indexing - 5 (High) Indexing - 4 Indexing - 3 Indexing - 2 Indexing - 1 (Low) Indexing - N/A Relevance Relevance - 5 (High) Relevance - 4 Relevance - 3 Relevance - 2 Relevance - 1 (Low) Relevance - N/A Timeliness Timeliness - 5 (High) Timeliness - 4 Timeliness - 3 Timeliness - 2 Timeliness - 1 (Low) Timeliness - N/A comment 6 Comments: 7. Please rate Petroleum Abstracts’ overall quality and overall value. answers 7 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Overall Quality Overall Quality - 5 (High) Overall Quality - 4 Overall Quality - 3 Overall Quality - 2 Overall Quality - 1 (Low) Overall Quality - N/A Overall Value Overall Value - 5 (High) Overall Value - 4 Overall Value - 3 Overall Value - 2 Overall Value - 1 (Low) Overall Value - N/A comment 7 Comments: suggestions Other Comments and Suggestions: Name (optional) Company (optional) E-mail (optional) To complete and submit the survey, select the preview button.