1. Please rate the importance to your organization of information coverage in the following areas (5 = highest, 1 = lowest, N/A = not applicable): answers 1 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Alternative fuels Alternative fuels - 5 (High) Alternative fuels - 4 Alternative fuels - 3 Alternative fuels - 2 Alternative fuels - 1 (Low) Alternative fuels - N/A Carbon/CO2 sequestration Carbon/CO2 sequestration - 5 (High) Carbon/CO2 sequestration - 4 Carbon/CO2 sequestration - 3 Carbon/CO2 sequestration - 2 Carbon/CO2 sequestration - 1 (Low) Carbon/CO2 sequestration - N/A Geothermal energy Geothermal energy - 5 (High) Geothermal energy - 4 Geothermal energy - 3 Geothermal energy - 2 Geothermal energy - 1 (Low) Geothermal energy - N/A Methane hydrates Methane hydrates - 5 (High) Methane hydrates - 4 Methane hydrates - 3 Methane hydrates - 2 Methane hydrates - 1 (Low) Methane hydrates - N/A Offshore rig decommissioning Offshore rig decommissioning - 5 (High) Offshore rig decommissioning - 4 Offshore rig decommissioning - 3 Offshore rig decommissioning - 2 Offshore rig decommissioning - 1 (Low) Offshore rig decommissioning - N/A Pipelines, shipping and storage Pipelines, shipping and storage - 5 (High) Pipelines, shipping and storage - 4 Pipelines, shipping and storage - 3 Pipelines, shipping and storage - 2 Pipelines, shipping and storage - 1 (Low) Pipelines, shipping and storage - N/A 2. Please rate the importance to your organization of coverage for the following types of publications. answers 2 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Professional society journals Professional society journals - 5 (High) Professional society journals - 4 Professional society journals - 3 Professional society journals - 2 Professional society journals - 1 (Low) Professional society journals - N/A Journals from scientific publishers (Elsevier, Springer, etc.) Journals from scientific publishers (Elsevier, Springer, etc.) - 5 (High) Journals from scientific publishers (Elsevier, Springer, etc.) - 4 Journals from scientific publishers (Elsevier, Springer, etc.) - 3 Journals from scientific publishers (Elsevier, Springer, etc.) - 2 Journals from scientific publishers (Elsevier, Springer, etc.) - 1 (Low) Journals from scientific publishers (Elsevier, Springer, etc.) - N/A Non-English-language journals Non-English-language journals - 5 (High) Non-English-language journals - 4 Non-English-language journals - 3 Non-English-language journals - 2 Non-English-language journals - 1 (Low) Non-English-language journals - N/A Other scientific journals Other scientific journals - 5 (High) Other scientific journals - 4 Other scientific journals - 3 Other scientific journals - 2 Other scientific journals - 1 (Low) Other scientific journals - N/A Other E&P-related periodicals Other E&P-related periodicals - 5 (High) Other E&P-related periodicals - 4 Other E&P-related periodicals - 3 Other E&P-related periodicals - 2 Other E&P-related periodicals - 1 (Low) Other E&P-related periodicals - N/A 3. Petroleum Abstracts has redesigned its Website at http://www.pa.utulsa.edu. Please rate the quality of the new PA Website in the following areas: answers 3 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Usefulness Usefulness - 5 (High) Usefulness - 4 Usefulness - 3 Usefulness - 2 Usefulness - 1 (Low) Usefulness - N/A Appearance Appearance - 5 (High) Appearance - 4 Appearance - 3 Appearance - 2 Appearance - 1 (Low) Appearance - N/A Ease of use Ease of use - 5 (High) Ease of use - 4 Ease of use - 3 Ease of use - 2 Ease of use - 1 (Low) Ease of use - N/A Relevance Relevance - 5 (High) Relevance - 4 Relevance - 3 Relevance - 2 Relevance - 1 (Low) Relevance - N/A Structure Structure - 5 (High) Structure - 4 Structure - 3 Structure - 2 Structure - 1 (Low) Structure - N/A 4. Please enter any suggestions you have for improving PA's new Website. answers 4 5. Please rate the quality of Petroleum Abstracts' BRICKS Online Search Aids in the following areas: answers 5 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Usefulness Usefulness - 5 (High) Usefulness - 4 Usefulness - 3 Usefulness - 2 Usefulness - 1 (Low) Usefulness - N/A Appearance Appearance - 5 (High) Appearance - 4 Appearance - 3 Appearance - 2 Appearance - 1 (Low) Appearance - N/A Ease of use Ease of use - 5 (High) Ease of use - 4 Ease of use - 3 Ease of use - 2 Ease of use - 1 (Low) Ease of use - N/A Structure Structure - 5 (High) Structure - 4 Structure - 3 Structure - 2 Structure - 1 (Low) Structure - N/A 6. Petroleum Abstracts is updating its BRICKS Online Search Aids in 2015. Please enter any suggestions you have for improving BRICKS. answers 6 7. Please rate the quality of the overall Petroleum Abstracts service in the following categories: answers 7 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Usefulness for information professionals Usefulness for information professionals - 5 (High) Usefulness for information professionals - 4 Usefulness for information professionals - 3 Usefulness for information professionals - 2 Usefulness for information professionals - 1 (Low) Usefulness for information professionals - N/A Usefulness for E&P professional end-users Usefulness for E&P professional end-users - 5 (High) Usefulness for E&P professional end-users - 4 Usefulness for E&P professional end-users - 3 Usefulness for E&P professional end-users - 2 Usefulness for E&P professional end-users - 1 (Low) Usefulness for E&P professional end-users - N/A Amount of material covered Amount of material covered - 5 (High) Amount of material covered - 4 Amount of material covered - 3 Amount of material covered - 2 Amount of material covered - 1 (Low) Amount of material covered - N/A Relevance of material covered Relevance of material covered - 5 (High) Relevance of material covered - 4 Relevance of material covered - 3 Relevance of material covered - 2 Relevance of material covered - 1 (Low) Relevance of material covered - N/A Timeliness of coverage Timeliness of coverage - 5 (High) Timeliness of coverage - 4 Timeliness of coverage - 3 Timeliness of coverage - 2 Timeliness of coverage - 1 (Low) Timeliness of coverage - N/A Usefulness of indexing Usefulness of indexing - 5 (High) Usefulness of indexing - 4 Usefulness of indexing - 3 Usefulness of indexing - 2 Usefulness of indexing - 1 (Low) Usefulness of indexing - N/A 8. Please rate Petroleum Abstracts’ overall quality and overall value. answers 8 5 (High)4321 (Low)N/A Overall Quality Overall Quality - 5 (High) Overall Quality - 4 Overall Quality - 3 Overall Quality - 2 Overall Quality - 1 (Low) Overall Quality - N/A Overall Value Overall Value - 5 (High) Overall Value - 4 Overall Value - 3 Overall Value - 2 Overall Value - 1 (Low) Overall Value - N/A Name (optional) Company (optional) E-mail (optional)